Skip to content
X-Dreamers

The Bible Family Tree

A Bible family tree from Adam to Jesus: the patriarchs, the twelve tribes, the house of David and the kings of Judah. Both genealogies of Jesus, Matthew's and Luke's, are traced through it, and you can see where they differ.

Pan and pinch through 237 people, from Adam to Jesus and beyond.

Naamah selected

Drag to pan · Scroll to zoom · Click a name · 237 people

Parent and childMarriedLegal fatherOnly in Luke 3Only in 1 Chronicles 3Descendant, generations not recordedBrothers of Jesus (debated)Matthew's lineLuke's linePassed over by Matthew
Two genealogies

Matthew 1 and Luke 3, side by side

Matthew traces Jesus forward from Abraham; Luke traces him back to Adam and to God. From Abraham to David the two lists agree. After David they share only two names, Shealtiel and Zerubbabel, and they give Joseph different fathers. Choose a name to find it in the tree.

Adam to Abraham

Only Luke goes back before Abraham, with one name the Hebrew Genesis lacks: Cainan.

Only Luke · Luke 3 · 20 names

Abraham to David: the lists agree

Matthew 1 · 14 names
  1. Matthew's group 1: 14 names
Luke 3 · 14 names

David to Shealtiel: through Solomon or through Nathan

Matthew 1 · 14 names
  1. Matthew's group 2: 14 names
Luke 3 · 20 names

Both lists: Shealtiel and Zerubbabel

Matthew 1 · 2 names
  1. Matthew's group 3: 13 names
Luke 3 · 2 names

Zerubbabel to Joseph: two different lines

Matthew 1 · 9 names
Luke 3 · 18 names

Both lists: Joseph and Jesus

Luke ends: “which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.”

Matthew 1 · 2 names
Luke 3 · 2 names

The women Matthew names

Why do they differ?

The difference, and the main explanations

The Gospels do not explain the difference, and neither mentions the other's list. Every explanation adds something the texts do not say. Here are the main ones, with how well each is supported.

  • What the texts say

    Textually stated

    Matthew: “Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus” (1:16), through Solomon and the kings. Luke: Jesus was “(as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli” (3:23), through Nathan. They agree from Abraham to David, share Shealtiel and Zerubbabel, and differ everywhere else between David and Joseph.

    Read: Matthew 1:16; Luke 3:23; Luke 3:31

    16And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.

    Matthew 1:16

    23And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,

    Luke 3:23

    31Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David,

    Luke 3:31
  • Matthew's list is selective

    Strongly supported

    Matthew counts three groups of fourteen (1:17). To get them he passes over three kings between Joram and Uzziah (Ahaziah, Joash, Amaziah) and Jehoiakim before Jechoniah, all known from Kings and Chronicles. “Begat” can mean “was the ancestor of”. The third group has only thirteen names unless Jechoniah or Jesus is counted twice.

    For
    • The omitted kings are named in 2 Kings 8–24 and 1 Chronicles 3:11–16.
    • Ancient genealogies often shortened lines to a pattern.
    Against
    • Matthew does not say why fourteen; that David's name in Hebrew letters adds up to 14 is only a suggestion.
    Read: Matthew 1:17; Matthew 1:8; 1 Chronicles 3:11–12

    17So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

    Matthew 1:17

    8And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias;

    Matthew 1:8

    11Joram his son, Ahaziah his son, Joash his son, 12Amaziah his son, Azariah his son, Jotham his son,

    1 Chronicles 3:11–12
  • Luke gives Mary's line

    Plausible

    Heli was Mary's father, and Joseph is “son of Heli” as his son-in-law; or the parenthesis “(as was supposed) the son of Joseph” sets Joseph aside and the line runs from Jesus to Heli through his mother. Matthew would then give Joseph's legal line, Luke Mary's natural one.

    For
    • Luke tells the birth from Mary's side (Luke 1–2).
    • It gives Jesus physical descent from David, which the New Testament assumes (Romans 1:3).
    Against
    • Luke names Joseph, not Mary, and the pattern “the son of” runs unbroken.
    • It became common only from the late fifteenth century; earlier hints are disputed.
    Read: Luke 3:23; Luke 1:32; Romans 1:3

    23And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,

    Luke 3:23

    32He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:

    Luke 1:32

    3Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;

    Romans 1:3
  • Both lists are Joseph's: by birth and by law

    Plausible

    Julius Africanus (c. AD 220), citing relatives of Jesus, says Jacob and Heli were half-brothers. Heli died childless, and Jacob married his widow to raise up a son for him, as the Law required. Joseph was then Jacob's son by birth and Heli's by law, so each Gospel is right.

    For
    • The oldest surviving explanation (Eusebius, Church History 1.7).
    • Levirate marriage is in the text: Deuteronomy 25:5–6, Tamar (Genesis 38), Ruth and Boaz, and Mark 12:19.
    Against
    • It rests on a family tradition no one can check; Africanus admits it is unproven.
    • It needs a second such case to explain Shealtiel's two fathers.
    Read: Deuteronomy 25:5–6; Mark 12:19; Genesis 38:8

    5If brethren dwell together, and one of them die, and have no child, the wife of the dead shall not marry without unto a stranger: her husband’s brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him to wife, and perform the duty of an husband’s brother unto her. 6And it shall be, that the firstborn which she beareth shall succeed in the name of his brother which is dead, that his name be not put out of Israel.

    Deuteronomy 25:5–6

    19Master, Moses wrote unto us, If a man’s brother die, and leave his wife behind him, and leave no children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.

    Mark 12:19

    8And Judah said unto Onan, Go in unto thy brother’s wife, and marry her, and raise up seed to thy brother.

    Genesis 38:8
  • Matthew lists the royal succession, Luke the natural line

    Speculative

    Matthew gives the heirs to David's throne, not necessarily fathers and sons. When Solomon's line failed, perhaps after Jechoniah, whose descendants Jeremiah said would not prosper on the throne, the right passed to a relative from Nathan's line, and the two lists meet at Shealtiel.

    For
    • Explains why Shealtiel is Jechoniah's son in Matthew and 1 Chronicles 3:17 but Neri's in Luke.
    Against
    • Jeremiah 22:30 concerns ruling, not descent.
    • No text says the right passed through Nathan's line.
    Read: Jeremiah 22:30; 1 Chronicles 3:17; Luke 3:27

    30Thus saith the LORD, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.

    Jeremiah 22:30

    17And the sons of Jeconiah; Assir, Salathiel his son,

    1 Chronicles 3:17

    27Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri,

    Luke 3:27
  • Shealtiel and Zerubbabel

    Plausible

    Most readers take them to be the same two men in both lists: the governor Zerubbabel and his father. Then Shealtiel had two fathers (Jechoniah, Neri), and 1 Chronicles 3:19 gives Zerubbabel a third (Pedaiah), which again points to levirate marriage or adoption. Others think Luke's pair were different men with the same names.

    For
    • Ezra, Haggai, Matthew and Luke all make Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel (Matthew and Luke spell them Zorobabel and Salathiel).
    Against
    • Two famous names in the same order could also be a coincidence of common names.
    Read: Ezra 3:2; 1 Chronicles 3:19; Luke 3:27

    2Then stood up Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and his brethren the priests, and Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and his brethren, and builded the altar of the God of Israel, to offer burnt offerings thereon, as it is written in the law of Moses the man of God.

    Ezra 3:2

    19And the sons of Pedaiah were, Zerubbabel, and Shimei: and the sons of Zerubbabel; Meshullam, and Hananiah, and Shelomith their sister:

    1 Chronicles 3:19

    27Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri,

    Luke 3:27
  • Cainan and other textual details

    Strongly supported

    Luke's Cainan (3:36) comes from the Greek Septuagint of Genesis 11:12, which Luke used; the Hebrew text lacks him. In Luke 3:33 many manuscripts read “Admin, the son of Arni” where the KJV, following the Textus Receptus, has “Aram”.

    Read: Luke 3:36; Genesis 11:12; Luke 3:33

    36Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,

    Luke 3:36

    12And Arphaxad lived five and thirty years, and begat Salah:

    Genesis 11:12

    33Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda,

    Luke 3:33
  • Four women before Mary

    Textually stated

    Matthew names Tamar, Rahab, Ruth and “her that had been the wife of Urias”. Why these four is a matter of interpretation: all have irregular or scandalous stories, and at least Rahab and Ruth were foreigners; together they prepare for the unusual birth from Mary.

    Read: Matthew 1:3; Matthew 1:5–6; Matthew 1:16

    3And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;

    Matthew 1:3

    5And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;

    Matthew 1:5–6

    16And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.

    Matthew 1:16

No explanation is proven. Christians have discussed the question since at least the early third century; the evidence leaves more than one reasonable answer.

Genesis 5 and 11

Overlapping lives

Genesis gives each father's age when his son was born and how long he lived. Laid end to end, the Hebrew figures make the lives overlap in surprising ways. Choose a bar to see who was alive at the same time.

Years from Adam, by the Hebrew figures

Shem (1558–2158) was alive at the same time as:

  • Methuselah 98 years together
  • Lamech 93 years together
  • Noah 448 years together
  • Arpachshad 438 years together
  • Shelah 433 years together
  • Eber 435 years together
  • Peleg 239 years together
  • Reu 239 years together
  • Serug 230 years together
  • Nahor 148 years together
  • Terah 205 years together
  • Abraham 175 years together
  • Isaac 110 years together
  • Jacob 50 years together
  • Methuselah died in the year of the Flood; he and Noah were alive together for 600 years.
  • Lamech, Noah's father, was 56 when Adam died.
  • Shem outlived Abraham by 35 years, and Eber outlived him too.

Assumes the lists have no gaps and that each figure is exact. The Greek Septuagint and the Samaritan Pentateuch give different ages, so these overlaps hold for the Hebrew text (followed by KJV and the 1919 CUV) only. Shem is placed at Noah's 502nd year (Genesis 11:10 with 7:6) and Abram at Terah's 70th (Genesis 11:26); Acts 7:4 may imply 130.

About this tree

Parent and partner links come from Theographic Bible Metadata, restricted to the 237 people shown here and checked against the text: every name is found in its key verses (KJV and the 1919 CUV), and the order of Matthew 1 and Luke 3 is tested name by name. Where the dataset takes an interpretive side (it makes Mary the daughter of Heli) or follows one genealogy (it puts Luke's Cainan into Genesis 11), the tree follows the text and marks the other reading. The layout draws one row per generation, so rows are not dates.

Sources

  • Theographic Bible Metadata by Robert Rouse, CC BY-SA 4.0: people, parents and partners. This lab's derived family-tree data is shared under the same license. CC BY-SA 4.0 · cfb1c48
  • King James Version (KJV) public domain: English verse text and name spellings.
  • Chinese Union Version (1919) public domain, via Wikisource: Chinese verse text and name spellings.
  • Eusebius, Church History 1.7 preserves Julius Africanus' Letter to Aristides (c. AD 220), the oldest surviving explanation of the two genealogies.

The genealogy of Jesus in Matthew and Luke

Matthew 1 and Luke 3 compared

Matthew 1 and Luke 3 compared
DirectionMatthew: Abraham down to Jesus · Luke: Jesus back to Adam, “the son of God”
NamesMatthew: 41, Abraham to Jesus · Luke: 76, Jesus to Adam
After DavidMatthew: through Solomon and the kings · Luke: through Nathan
Joseph's fatherMatthew: Jacob (1:16) · Luke: Heli (3:23)
Shared after DavidShealtiel and Zerubbabel
PatternMatthew: three groups of fourteen generations (1:17)
Women namedMatthew: Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, Uriah's wife and Mary · Luke: none

Key verses 5

1The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

Matthew 1:1

16And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.

Matthew 1:16

17So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

Matthew 1:17

23And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,

Luke 3:23

38Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Luke 3:38

Scripture quotations: King James Version (1769) (KJV).

What the Bible says, what our model adds to it, where good readers disagree, and where the old copies and the translations differ. We set the views side by side and do not pick a winner.

  • Textually stated5
  • Strongly supported4
  • Plausible1
  • Artistic1

A few of the model's choices

  • Strongly supported

    Parents and partners come from Theographic Bible Metadata, with each change the lab makes listed with its reason.

  • Strongly supported

    Jesus' two genealogies are both shown, each marked as Matthew's or Luke's, without merging them.

  • Plausible

    Luke's Cainan, between Arphaxad and Shelah, is drawn as Luke's link only; the main line follows the Hebrew of Genesis 11.

Show all 14
What the text says5

Stated in Scripture. Quoted from the King James Version (KJV) and the 1919 Chinese Union Version (和合本).

  • Matthew opens with the genealogy of Jesus Christ, son of David, son of Abraham, and traces it down from Abraham.

    Textually stated

    1The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

    Matthew 1:1 · KJV
  • In Matthew, Joseph is the son of Jacob, the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born.

    Textually stated

    16And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.

    Matthew 1:16 · KJV
  • In Luke, Jesus was "(as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli", and the line runs up to Adam.

    Textually stated

    23And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,

    Luke 3:23 · KJV
  • Matthew counts three sets of fourteen generations.

    Textually stated

    17So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

    Matthew 1:17 · KJV
  • Genesis gives the generations of Adam, and the later lines of Shem and of the patriarchs.

    Textually stated

    1This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;

    Genesis 5:1 · KJV
What the model adds6

Choices the reconstruction has to make where the text is silent, each with its evidence level and the reason for it.

Strongly supported4
  • Parents and partners come from Theographic Bible Metadata, with each change the lab makes listed with its reason.

    Why: Theographic is an open dataset of biblical people tied to their verses; the lab checks that every person's name occurs in KJV or the 和合本 at the verses cited.

  • Jesus' two genealogies are both shown, each marked as Matthew's or Luke's, without merging them.

    Why: Both are Scripture, and they differ between David and Joseph; merging them would choose one explanation.

  • Matthew's line goes from Joram straight to Uzziah; the three kings between them are shown from Kings and Chronicles.

    Why: 1 Chronicles 3:11–12 names Ahaziah, Joash and Amaziah between Joram and Azariah (Uzziah).

  • Name meanings are given only where the text explains the name or the Hebrew is clear.

    Why: Many names are explained in the verse that gives them (Genesis 29–30, for example); others are uncertain and left without a meaning.

Plausible1
  • Luke's Cainan, between Arphaxad and Shelah, is drawn as Luke's link only; the main line follows the Hebrew of Genesis 11.

    Why: Genesis 11:12 and 1 Chronicles 1 have no Cainan; the Greek Septuagint of Genesis and Luke 3:36 do. Theographic routes the line through Cainan, and the lab corrects that.

Artistic1
  • The arrangement of branches, colours and generations on screen is a drawing choice.

    Why: The text gives relations, not a layout; spouses and lines are placed to keep the tree readable.

Competing views1

Where careful readers disagree. Each view with who holds it and the evidence for and against it. No verdict.

Why do Matthew and Luke give Joseph different fathers (Jacob and Heli)?

Matthew 1:16; Luke 3:23

Luke gives Mary's line, with Heli as her father

Held by A common explanation among theologians, revived by Annius of Viterbo in 1498

For

  • Luke tells the birth from Mary's side, and his "as was supposed" sets Joseph's fatherhood apart.

Against

  • Luke names Joseph, not Mary, as Heli's son; most modern scholars find this reading implausible.

Sources: Wikipedia, "Genealogy of Jesus"

Both are Joseph's: one legal father, one natural, through a levirate marriage

Held by Julius Africanus (3rd century, Epistle to Aristides), reporting a family tradition

For

  • Levirate marriage was a known law (Deuteronomy 25:5–6), and it explains how one man can have two fathers on record.

Against

  • Neither Gospel says so; the tradition comes two centuries later.

Sources: Wikipedia, "Genealogy of Jesus"

Matthew gives the royal, legal succession; Luke the natural descent

Held by Another common explanation: one line is legal, the other by blood

For

  • Matthew's line runs through the kings from Solomon, Luke's through David's son Nathan.

Against

  • It still has to explain how the two lines meet at Shealtiel and Zerubbabel and part again.

Sources: Wikipedia, "Genealogy of Jesus"

What the lab shows (a drawing choice, not a ruling): The tree shows both lines side by side and does not join them.

Textual notes2

Places where manuscripts, ancient versions or translations differ in numbers or wording. KJV and 和合本 are quoted as they stand.

Cainan between Arphaxad and Shelah (Luke 3:36)

Manuscripts

36Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,

Luke 3:36 · KJV

36沙拉是該南的兒子、該南是亞法撒的兒子、亞法撒是閃的兒子、閃是挪亞的兒子、挪亞是拉麥的兒子、

路加福音 3:36 · 和合本 (CUV 1919)

12And Arphaxad lived five and thirty years, and begat Salah:

Genesis 11:12 · KJV

12亞法撒活到三十五歲、生了沙拉.

創世記 11:12 · 和合本 (CUV 1919)
Other witnesses
Hebrew Genesis 11:12 and 1 Chronicles 1no Cainan: Arphaxad fathered Shelah
Greek Septuagint of Genesis; the Book of JubileesCainan between Arphaxad and Shelah

Both KJV and the 和合本 have Cainan in Luke 3:36 and no Cainan in Genesis 11:12. Luke's list agrees with the Greek Genesis, not the Hebrew.

Sources: Wikipedia, "Cainan"

Three kings left out of Matthew's fourteens

Parallel accounts

8And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias;

Matthew 1:8 · KJV

8亞撒生約沙法.約沙法生約蘭.約蘭生烏西亞.

馬太福音 1:8 · 和合本 (CUV 1919)

11Joram his son, Ahaziah his son, Joash his son, 12Amaziah his son, Azariah his son, Jotham his son,

1 Chronicles 3:11–12 · KJV

11約沙法的兒子是約蘭、約蘭的兒子是亞哈謝、亞哈謝的兒子是約阿施、12約阿施的兒子是亞瑪謝、亞瑪謝的兒子是亞撒利雅、亞撒利雅的兒子是約坦、

歷代志上 3:11–12 · 和合本 (CUV 1919)

Matthew has "Joram begat Ozias" (Ozias is Uzziah); Chronicles lists Ahaziah, Joash and Amaziah between them (Uzziah is also called Azariah). Leaving them out keeps the second set at fourteen; they were also kings remembered as especially wicked.

Sources: Wikipedia, "Genealogy of Jesus"

Frequently asked questions

Why are Jesus' genealogies in Matthew and Luke different?

Matthew traces Jesus from Abraham through Solomon and the kings; Luke goes back to Adam through David's son Nathan. They agree from Abraham to David, share only Shealtiel and Zerubbabel after David, and give Joseph different fathers: Jacob in Matthew 1:16, Heli in Luke 3:23. The Gospels do not explain the difference. The main explanations are that Luke gives Mary's line, or that Joseph was Jacob's son by birth and Heli's by law through levirate marriage, as Julius Africanus wrote about AD 220. Both are plausible; neither is proven.

How many generations were there from Adam to Jesus?

Luke's list names 76 people from Jesus back to Adam, “the son of God” (Luke 3:23–38), so it counts 75 generations between them. That is a count of names, not of years: biblical genealogies can pass over generations, as Matthew does on purpose, and Luke's Cainan (3:36) is not in the Hebrew text of Genesis 11. Manuscripts of Luke also differ by a name or two.

Is Luke's genealogy the line of Mary?

Possibly. Some take Heli as Mary's father, with Joseph called his son as son-in-law, or read “(as was supposed) the son of Joseph” as setting Joseph aside. Against it, Luke names Joseph, not Mary, and the view became common only from the late fifteenth century. The lab rates it plausible, not proven.

How many generations are in Matthew's genealogy of Jesus?

Matthew counts three groups of fourteen (Matthew 1:17): Abraham to David, David to the exile, and the exile to Christ. His list names 41 people from Abraham to Jesus. To keep the pattern he passes over four kings known from Kings and Chronicles (Ahaziah, Joash, Amaziah and Jehoiakim), and the third group has only thirteen names unless one is counted twice.

Which women are named in the genealogy of Jesus?

Matthew names Tamar, Rahab, Ruth and “her that had been the wife of Urias”, then Mary. Why these four is a matter of interpretation: their stories are irregular or scandalous, and at least Rahab and Ruth were foreigners. Luke's list names no women.

Were Methuselah and Noah alive at the same time?

By the Hebrew figures in Genesis 5, yes: Methuselah died in the year of the Flood, and he and Noah were alive together for 600 years. This assumes the lists have no gaps; the Greek Septuagint and the Samaritan Pentateuch give different ages.

Who is in the Bible family tree?

237 people: the line from Adam through Noah and Shem to Abraham; the patriarchs and the twelve tribes; Levi's line with Moses, Aaron and the priests; the houses of Saul and David and the kings of Judah; neighbouring peoples such as Edom, Moab and Ishmael; and both genealogies of Jesus, down to his brothers, John the Baptist and Paul. The Bible names far more people; the tree keeps to the lines that carry the story.

Sources & limits

Limits of this lab 4

  • The tree shows the people the Bible names and the links it states or that Theographic records; many lines are partial, and women are often unnamed in the text.
  • Some names stand for more than one person, and some people have more than one name; the lab's merges and splits are listed in its data with reasons.
  • Genealogies can skip generations, so the tree is not a timeline.
  • Chinese names follow the 1919 和合本.

Sources 5

  1. King James Version (KJV) (Public domain outside the United Kingdom)
  2. 官話和合譯本 (Chinese Union Version, 1919), zh.wikisource (Public domain)
  3. Wikipedia, "Genealogy of Jesus"
  4. Wikipedia, "Cainan"
  5. Theographic Bible Metadata (people and family links) (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Scripture is quoted only from KJV and the 1919 和合本. Other works are cited for facts and arguments, not quoted at length.

How we build the Labs →Found a mistake? Report it →

What’s new · v1.1.1Version 1.1.1: English Scripture is now quoted from the King James Version (1769). Matthew 1 and Luke 3 now show the names as the KJV spells them (Booz, Naasson, Phares…).